NATO, wha’?

Late last month, I took a recent trip to Luhansk, Ukraine’s easternmost city, to catch the trans-Ukraine “Luhansk-L’viv” train.  I arrived to Luhansk in the morning, a few hours early than everyone else.  This gave me the opportunity to walk around and absorb a little eastern Ukraine ambiance.  Because I live in Ukrainian-speaking city in the far western part of Ukraine, it’s always interesting to cross into the more Russo-phone areas of the country.  Or, in Luhansk’s case, almost entirely Russo-phone areas.  The politics also differ considerably.  “NATO, Yes!” billboards dot western Ukraine, the architecture in city centers reflects the region’s shared history with Europe, and the prevailing political orientation is toward the West.  In Luhansk, anti-NATO propaganda (“NATO, No!”) is displayed prominently, Soviet-era architecture dominates, and people’s tend to lean toward Russia politically.

Arriving to Luhank's train station

Local organization "Russian Heritage." "Give our native language government status!"

Lenin gazing at a Soviet concrete mural on top of a movie theater.

One of the more interesting sights in Luhansk–to me–was the local province administration photo boards smack in the city center.  Most of them dealt with topics you’d expect: “What they’re talking about,” “The smiles of our loved ones,” “Democracy – Authority of the People,” and so on.  Then there was the “So Marches NATO” photo board.  It featured pictures of graphic death and destruction caused by NATO operations in Serbia and Afghanistan, as well as pictures from Iraq.  Iraq, of course, is not a NATO operation and Ukrainian soldiers were involved in that particular invasion from the beginning.  But that didn’t prevent the creators of the board from including it in their attempt to paint the organization as a tool of Western warmongering and imperialism that bullies weaker members into supporting unnecessary wars.

"How NATO marches"

Close-up of the right side

On the left, "A serb child's drawing before the war..." On the right, "...and after."

A US soldier with a bloodied knife

  In addition to photos, a piece of paper with the following text was displayed on the board:

NATO information sheet

They tell us: NATO – it’s a great good for Ukraine. Collective security, world standards… These photographs demonstrate unambiguously enough what, in truth, is NATO and the type of peace supported by this military block. These pictures, of which there are hundreds more like these and bloodier, are placed on the Internet on the sites:

www.children.org.yu/english/drawings
www.hrw.org/reports/2000/nato

http://le-vina.livejournal.com

http://politicalmavens.com/index.php/2008/04/13/babies-cut-from-mothers-wombs-warning-graphic-visual-at-bottom

http://www.undermars.com/category/wrecked

www.slobodan-memoria.narod.ru
www.usinfo.ru
www.uznaipravda.ru

Surely it is not accidental that everywhere NATO “peace keepers” go, blood pours and thousands of peaceful citizens perish? Afghanistan, Iraq, Serbia–the pictures gathered on this board are of these conflicts. Look and remember seeing them the next time one of the “great” Ukrainian politicians tries to convince you that it is necessary for our country to join the North Atlantic alliance.

If we agree, we are, of course, on the same side–we will be faced with the citizens of the next unfortunate country, whether mourning the lost or those shot defenselessly, where the leadership of NATO decided to impose their order. Joining the block, we will receive not only “protection,” but also the liability of participating in “peace keeping” operations. Decide in a word: is this the fate you wish for your children?

NATO membership is a huge debate in Ukraine, with President Yushchenko strongly supporting membership and the opposition staunchly opposing it. While the debate has died down somewhat of late, it is still a wedge issue that politicians use to drive their support. The West-leaning parties paint the organization as one of peace and collective security that will modernize the Ukrainian military, much as we do in the US. Russia-leaning politicians paint it as a tool of the US that forces weaker member states into military actions that result in the needless deaths of innocent civilians. They also claim NATO membership will bring US military bases and a loss of Ukraine’s sovereign ability to decide what wars it wants to fight. I recall seeing some billboards outside of Kyiv last year that featured a picture of a black Humvee with a gunner positioned at a large machine gun patrolling a city street. The implication is obvious: if we join NATO, we’ll be policed by heavily armed soldiers. It’s an interesting fear, but I don’t think it really has a basis. I’d say this view of NATO is similar to how Russian peace-keepers in Moldova and Georgia are portrayed by governments and media in the West (which, honestly, gets me thinking about portrayals of Russian peace-keepers in the West).

It will be interesting to see how this issue plays out after the upcoming presidential election. At this point, it doesn’t look good for those that believe Ukraine should become a member of NATO. Yushchenko will likely not win a second term as president, which leaves his ally, Yulia Tymoshenko, and the current oppostion leader, Viktor Yanukovych. Tymoshenko has become cool on NATO membership after originally being a strong supporter, and the opposition has evolved into predicating NATO membership on a national referendum, which, because most Ukrainians are opposed to membership, would almost certainly fail. A shrewd political strategy: achieve your goals without any of the blame.

Outside of Ukraine, many NATO members have cooled dramatically at the idea of Ukrainian membership after the conflict between Russia and Georgia became open war for a few weeks last August. They fear being pulled into a diplomatic and/or military crisis because of the behavior of these countries. Even before the conflict, and despite the vocal protests of the Bush Administration, NATO refused to extend Ukraine a Membership Action Plan, the first official step in becoming a member. So, at the moment, NATO membership for Ukraine is solidly on ice.

Socialism?

Also, I thought this was a great, home-town response to the absolute ridiculous charges of “socialism” being spread by conservative talking heads:

No socialist would vote for stimulus

Re the letter “Pitts doesn’t understand,” Feb. 1: Conservatives like Rush Limbaugh who characterize the stimulus or the bailout as socialism clearly have a very poor understanding of economics. I think they must be either in denial about, or trying to deflect attention from, the recent failures of capitalism. The free market, contrary to its own propaganda, is not self-regulating, and tends toward deregulation, declining wages and asset bubbles. It therefore relies on government intervention in times of crisis. No self-respecting socialist would vote for these packages, because their intention is to revive capitalism, something that should be made obvious by the fact that established financial periodicals all over the world have called for their passage.

And frankly, as a proud American socialist, I’m offended by the continuous misrepresentation of my beliefs in the media. Some of the greatest Americans were socialists, like Albert Einstein and Helen Keller. Socialism is not synonymous with government spending, a welfare state, or centralized planning, but can be defined more broadly as economic democracy and collective ownership.

People are entitled to their reservations about economic alternatives, but to accept that the current system is the best possible is a resignation to the powers that be and a failure of imagination.

— Mary Loritz

Springboro

(via the Dayton Daily News)

RE: The Economic Stimulus Bill

This is the e-mail I sent to my local congressman, Mike Turner, aka, one of the Republican members of Congress that unanimously voted against the House’s stimulus package.  As he voted against Bush’s bank rescue package, it will probably have little effect.  I will say this:  a vote against this bill will drastically decrease any amount of sympathy for him I may have begun to felt during the last election, and virtually assure a vote for his opponent in 2010.

Congressman Turner,

As a current Peace Corps volunteer in Ukraine, I spend a great deal of time teaching Ukrainian students about the virtues of American democracy. This has been a great privilege and among the most rewarding aspects of my work here.

One of the key realizations I’ve had about democracy and why it has worked so effectively in the USA while experiencing a turbulent ride in Ukraine is not related to any specific clause of the US Constitution–or any law, for that matter. It is because of compromise. America has a grand tradition of political compromise and accommodation, and it is a greater nation because of it.

So it is with great disappointment that I read about the house vote on the economic stimulus bill currently before Congress. Not a single Republican congressman voted in favor of it. This is partisanship and political grandstanding, not a practical effort at combating the negative effects of the economic crisis before us. Please put country first and support his bill.